Libby
Perl
Specialist in Housing Policy
The
Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) provides funds to states,
the District of Columbia, U.S. territories and commonwealths, and Indian
tribal organizations (collectively referred to as grantees) primarily to
help low-income households pay home energy expenses. The LIHEAP statute
provides for two types of funding: regular funds (sometimes referred to as
block grant funds) and emergency contingency funds. Regular funds are allocated
to grantees based on a formula, while contingency funds may be released to
one or more grantees at the discretion of the Secretary of the Department
of Health and Human Services based on emergency need.
Regular LIHEAP funds are allocated to the states according to a formula that
has a long and complicated history. (Tribes receive funds based on either
their number of federally eligible LIHEAP households compared to the total
number in the state or on agreements with their states, whereas
territories receive a set percentage of total LIHEAP regular funds.) In 1980,
Congress created the predecessor program to LIHEAP, the Low Income Energy
Assistance Program (LIEAP), as part of the Crude Oil Windfall Profits Tax
Act (P.L. 96-223). Because Congress was particularly concerned with the
high costs of heating, funds under LIEAP were distributed according to a
multi-step formula that benefitted cold-weather states. In 1981, Congress
enacted LIHEAP as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (P.L.
97-35), replacing LIEAP. However, the LIHEAP statute specified that states
would continue to receive the same percentage of regular funds that they
did under the LIEAP formula.
When Congress reauthorized LIHEAP in 1984 as part of the Human Services
Reauthorization Act (P.L. 98-558), it changed the program’s formula by
requiring the use of more recent population and energy data and requiring
that HHS consider both heating and cooling costs of low-income households
(a change from the focus on the heating needs of all households). The effect of
these changes meant that, in general, funds would be shifted from
cold-weather states to warm-weather states. To prevent a dramatic shift of
funds, Congress added two “hold-harmless” provisions to the formula. The
result of these provisions is a current law, three-tiered formula (sometimes referred
to as the “new” formula), the application of which depends on the amount of
regular funds that Congress appropriates.
The Tier I formula is used to allocate funds when the total LIHEAP regular fund
appropriation is less than or equal to the equivalent of a hypothetical
FY1984 appropriation of $1.975 billion. Above this level, funds are
allocated according to Tier II of the formula, which includes a holdharmless level
to prevent certain states from losing LIHEAP funds. Finally, Tier III
applies to appropriations at or above $2.25 billion, and includes a second
hold-harmless provision, the holdharmless rate. Since FY1986,
LIHEAP regular fund appropriations have exceeded the equivalent of an
FY1984 appropriation of $1.975 billion in FY2006, when the regular fund
appropriation was $2.48 billion; in FY2008, when appropriations slightly
exceeded the trigger; in FY2009 through FY2011, when Congress directed
that $840 million be distributed according to the “new” LIHEAP formula;
and in FY2012, when Congress directed that $497 million be distributed according
to the “new” formula.
This report will be updated when new formula data are released and when
proposed funding levels change. See Appendix C for FY2013 estimated
allocations at the President’s request level and the level in the Senate
Appropriations Committee-passed bill, S. 3295.
Date of Report: June 18, 2012
Number of Pages: 38
Order Number: RL33275
Price: $29.95
Follow us on TWITTER at http://www.twitter.com/alertsPHP
or #CRSreports
Document available via e-mail as a pdf file or in paper form.
To order, e-mail
Penny
Hill Press,or call us at 301-253-0881. Provide a Visa, MasterCard, American
Express, or Discover card number, expiration date, and name on the card.
Indicate whether you want e-mail or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred
and receive priority processing.