Darryl
E. Getter
Specialist in Financial Economics
Prior
to the recent financial crisis, mortgage underwriting standards were relaxed to
the point where many borrowers could only repay their loans if favorable
financial conditions that existed at the time of origination remained
intact. In other words, borrowers obtained mortgage loans that relied upon
interest rates not rising or the value of the underlying collateral (house
prices) not declining. When market conditions changed, however, many
mortgage loans became delinquent and went into default. The mortgage
defaults often translated into large losses for both the borrowers and the
financial industry.
After enactment of The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act; P.L. 111-203), the Federal Reserve Board
announced a proposed qualified mortgage (QM) rule that would establish “ability
to repay” standards for mortgage lending. The Federal Reserve, along with
other federal regulatory agencies, also jointly released a proposed risk
retention or qualified residential mortgage (QRM) rule to require parties
involved in a transaction in which mortgage originations are sold to
retain “skin-in-the-game” or a minimum percentage of the credit risk of
financial products, which would result in the sharing of any eventual
losses. Adoption of ability to repay and risk-retention standards may
discourage lenders from excessively relaxing lending standards even during
economic boom periods, thus making loan repayment more resilient to sudden
shifts in short-term economic and financial conditions.
The ability to repay and risk-retention standards, while designed to curtail
the pre-crisis proliferation of risky lending practices, are likely to
simultaneously reduce access to mortgage credit. Although ability-to-repay
standards would encourage consistent underwriting at all times, some
borrowers that benefit from lender flexibility during more favorable
macroeconomic conditions are likely to face increased difficulty obtaining
mortgage loans. Lenders may be reluctant to originate loans that are not
in compliance with the ability-to-repay standards if this exposes them to
increased legal risks. Likewise, risk-retention standards that translate into
more stringent qualification requirements for borrowers are likely to
increase barriers to homeownership for both creditworthy and disadvantaged
borrowers.
The 112th Congress is overseeing the rulemaking stemming from the Dodd-Frank
Act. This report examines the developments associated with the
implementation of mortgage lending reforms. After summarizing the proposed
ability to repay and risk-retention standards, a description of risky
underwriting practices that occurred prior to the mortgage crisis is presented,
followed by a discussion of possible effects on mortgage credit
accessibility.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which will prescribe final
regulations on QM rule, has re-opened the comment period to seek further
comments on the litigation risks that could potentially arise from the new
requirements. The comments, however, should be narrowly focused and based
upon analysis that uses mortgage data provided by the regulator of Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac. The closing date for comments will be July 9, 2012.
Date of Report: June 5, 2012
Number of Pages: 18
Order Number: R42056
Price: $29.95
Follow us on TWITTER at http://www.twitter.com/alertsPHP
or #CRSreports
Document available via e-mail as a pdf file or in paper form.
To order, e-mail
Penny
Hill Press or call us at 301-253-0881. Provide a Visa, MasterCard, American
Express, or Discover card number, expiration date, and name on the card.
Indicate whether you want e-mail or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred
and receive priority processing.