Sean Lowry
Analyst in Public Finance
Jane G. Gravelle
Senior Specialist in Economic Policy
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA; P.L. 111-148 and P.L. 111-152) contains
Analyst in Public Finance
Jane G. Gravelle
Senior Specialist in Economic Policy
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA; P.L. 111-148 and P.L. 111-152) contains
several provisions to encourage
employer-sponsored health coverage, particularly among small
businesses. The provisions that
most directly relate to small businesses are (1) an employer
penalty for not providing
health insurance, (2) a tax credit to increase the affordability of health
care for the smallest firms,
and (3) small business health insurance exchanges designed to
increase plan options and lower
plan costs.
Several events have altered ACA’s implementation since its enactment in 2010. Most notably, the
Obama administration delayed
the implementation of the employer penalty and part of the small
business health exchanges from
2014 to 2015 to allow for more time for developing these
provisions and allowing firms
to come into compliance. These delays have added to uncertainty
over the potential effects of
ACA on small businesses.
First, this report explains how employer-sponsored insurance can be used to address concerns
about health insurance coverage
and cost. Second, it summarizes the three ACA provisions most
relevant to small businesses,
listed above. Next, it analyzes these provisions for their potential
effects on small businesses.
Last, this report presents several approaches that could address some
concerns associated with these
provisions (particularly the employer penalty).
According to analysis of the most recent employer size and insurance coverage data, ACA’s
employer penalty is structured
so that it could exempt approximately 96.3% of employer firms
simply because they would be
too small, and thus fall below the employer penalty threshold of 50
full-time equivalent (FTE)
employees. These exempt firms account for approximately 28.1% of
all workers. After accounting
for firms that already provide insurance, less than 1% of employer
firms could be subject to the
employer penalty. Although 71.9% of all employees work for firms
that are large enough to be
potentially subject to the penalty, only about 1.7% of employees work
in firms that do not already
offer health insurance.
Less than 4% of small businesses that could have been eligible for the small business health care
tax credit in 2010 actually
claimed it. According to a report by the Government Accountability
Office (GAO), many business
owners felt that (1) the credit was too small of an incentive to
begin offering insurance; (2)
even if these small employers offered health insurance, some
employees declined coverage
because they felt that they cannot afford their share of the premium;
and (3) the rules were too
complex. President Obama has proposed simplifying and expanding the
credit.
Small business health exchanges could help to reduce some barriers to accessing relatively
affordable health coverage in
the small-group market. By pooling risk among multiple businesses
and reducing administrative
costs, average insurance costs could reduce costs for these firms. On
the other hand, firms with
relatively healthier employees could see a rise in insurance costs.
Date of Report: August 15, 2013
Number of Pages: 26
Order Number: R43181
Price: $29.95
To Order:
R43181.pdf to use the SECURE SHOPPING CART
e-mail congress@pennyhill.com
Phone 301-253-0881
For email and phone orders, provide a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover card number, expiration date, and name on the card. Indicate whether you want e-mail or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred and receive priority processing.