Search Penny Hill Press

Monday, February 7, 2011

Economic Analysis of the Enhanced Form 1099 Information Reporting Requirements

Mark P. Keightley
Analyst in Public Finance

Beginning January 1, 2012, a business will have to file a Form 1099-MISC information return with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) if the total amount of payments made to most businesses in exchange for goods or services is $600 or more in a year. Previous law only required that an information return be filed for payments made in exchange for services and exempted payments made to corporations. The new reporting requirements were enacted as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148) and are intended to increase tax payment compliance and reduce the net tax gap. The net tax gap is estimated to be around $356 billion in 2010 after adjusting for inflation and recouped taxes. The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimates that the new reporting requirements will raise $17.1 billion over 10 years, or about $1.7 billion on average annually.

This report analyzes the new 1099-MISC requirements. Data on the tax gap and tax payment compliance are presented. Small business taxpayers are shown to be the largest single contributor to the tax gap and are also shown to have one of the highest rates of noncompliance. The JCT revenue score is used to estimate that the new requirements will reduce the tax gap by 0.50%, and increase tax payment compliance by 0.40%. The value of the new requirements is evaluated from the perspective of the revenue raised in comparison to the compliance costs imposed on businesses and the administrative costs imposed on the government.

In the 112
th Congress, Representative Dan Lungren introduced the Small Business Paperwork Mandate Elimination Act of 2011 (H.R. 4), which would repeal the new 1099-MISC reporting requirements. Several proposal were also offered in the 111th Congress to repeal or modify the new reporting requirements. Legislation was introduced by Representative Sander Levin (H.R. 5982), Senator Mike Johanns (S. 3578, S.Amdt. 4596 to H.R. 5297, and S.Amdt. 4702 to S. 510 ), Senator Max Baucus (S.Amdt. 4713 to S. 510), and Representative Dan Lungren (H.R. 5141) that would have repealed the new requirements. A proposal made by Senator Bill Nelson (S.Amdt. 4595 to H.R. 5297) would have increased the reporting threshold to $5,000 for payments in exchange for goods, and exempt businesses with no more than 25 employees from the reporting requirements for payments in exchange for goods. The $600 reporting threshold for payments in exchange for services would have been unchanged. These proposals are evaluated in this report.

Both the Bush and Obama Administrations have presented an option in several recent budget proposals that would have required reporting for payments in exchange for goods, but to continue to exempt payments to corporations. Others have suggested simplifying the tax code to reduce the incentive to evade or avoid taxes, and upgrading information reporting infrastructure at the IRS to reduce the burden of being compliant.

Date of Report: January 21, 2011
Number of Pages: 15
Order Number: R41400
Price: $29.95

Follow us on TWITTER at or #CRSreports

Document available via e-mail as a pdf file or in paper form.
To order, e-mail
Penny Hill Press  or call us at 301-253-0881. Provide a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover card number, expiration date, and name on the card. Indicate whether you want e-mail or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred and receive priority processing.