Insurance and Financial Regulatory Reform in the 111th Congress

Baird Webel
Specialist in Financial Economics

In the aftermath of the recent financial crisis, broad financial regulatory reform legislation has been advanced by the Obama Administration and by various Members of Congress. Under the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945, insurance regulation is generally left to the individual states. For several years prior to the financial crisis, some Members of Congress have introduced legislation to federalize insurance regulation along the lines of the regulation of the banking sector, although none of this legislation has reached the committee markup stage.

The financial crisis, particularly the role of insurance giant AIG and the smaller monoline bond insurers, changed the tenor of the debate around insurance regulation, with increased emphasis on the systemic importance of insurance companies. While it could be argued that insurer involvement in the financial crisis demonstrates the need for full-scale federal regulation of insurance, to date the broad financial regulatory reform proposals have not included language implementing such a system. Instead, broad reform proposals have tended to include the creation of a somewhat narrower federal office focusing on gathering information on insurance and setting policy on international insurance issues. Legislation proposed by the Obama Administration, Representative Paul Kanjorski (H.R. 2609 as incorporated into H.R. 4173), and Senator Christopher Dodd (S. 3217), all contain slightly differing versions of such an office.

The broad reform proposals could also affect insurance through consumer protection or systemic risk provisions, though insurance is largely exempted from these aspects of the legislation as well. The Obama proposal exempts insurance from the proposed federal consumer protection agency's oversight, except for title, credit, and mortgage insurance whereas Representative Barney Frank's H.R. 4173 as passed by the House exempts all insurance from the federal consumer protection agency's purview and S. 3217 would do so as well. In all three proposals, large insurers could be considered systemically significant and be subject to oversight by a systemic risk council and the Federal Reserve as well as federal resolution authority.

H.R. 4173 and S. 3217 also include narrower insurance reform language regarding surplus lines insurance and reinsurance similar to H.R. 2572/S. 1363, which had previously passed the House.

The House of Representatives passed H.R. 4173 on December 11, 2009, by a vote of 223-202. The Senate considered S. 3217 through April and May 2010. On May 20, 2010, the Senate finished the amendment process to S. 3217, substituted this bill as amended into H.R. 4317, and passed the Senate version of H.R. 4173 by a vote of 59-39. The conference committee to reconcile the two versions of H.R. 4173 convened for its first meeting on June 10, 2010.


Date of Report: June 16, 2010
Number of Pages: 10
Order Number: R41018
Price: $29.95

Document available via e-mail as a pdf file or in paper form.
To order, e-mail Penny Hill Press or call us at 301-253-0881. Provide a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover card number, expiration date, and name on the card. Indicate whether you want e-mail or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred and receive priority processing.